Recent News

    July 20th, 2013

    Whither the No Child Left Behind Act?

    It’s been challenging to follow the machinations about this law in Congress.

    Yesterday the House voted on party lines to amend the NCLB and take its implementation back to the states–instead of the federal government.

    This write up in Ed Week  is a good one–it lays out the pros and cons and tells us who is for the House version and who against… as well as what the Senate may be up to.

    http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/campaign-k-12/2013/07/house_debates_no_child_left_re.html

    What to make of this? First observation–groups that represent school districts favor the House version of more local control. Others don’t. Sad, isn’t it–to have such a dispute–especially as, in the end, it all comes down to those schools.

    Second observation–many groups decry the House version as saying it lowers expectations and doesn’t continue the push for high standards for all students. But I have a hard time understanding this argument since 39 states and DC have received waivers from those very expectations. (Remember how all students were going to be ‘proficient’ by 2014–that is next year! ) What am I missing here?

    Post by Miriam Kurtzig Freedman, M.A., J.D. | No Comments

    July 18th, 2013

    I know, I know.

    I know. It’s been over a month since my last blog.  I’m sorry about that… and have no excuses. That’s just what happened.

    The good news is that it is now possible for you to buy my three little flipbooks through PayPal on this website!

    Please visit the  Store... and you’ll see this step forward.

    I hope your summer is going well.

    Post by Miriam Kurtzig Freedman, M.A., J.D. | No Comments

    June 11th, 2013

    ‘Performance grouping’ is back! That’s a good thing!

    There seems to be growing support for ‘ ability’ grouping. I’d much rather it be called ‘performance grouping.’ How is the child performing now! What are the next steps for that child based on current performance (not some notion of ability or potential).
    This practice–whatever we call it– is resurging.  As a former teacher and parent, I believe we should be doing more –rather than less–of this.
    Thus, I was happy to see these articles in the NY Tiimes. I’d call it ‘performance grouping.’ I believe we should be doing more of it to meet children’s needs wherever they are based on current performance.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/10/education/grouping-students-by-ability-regains-favor-with-educators.html?_r=0

    http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/10/02/are-top-students-getting-short-shrift/acknowledging-the-trade-offs-in-differentiation

    Post by Miriam Kurtzig Freedman, M.A., J.D. | No Comments

    June 11th, 2013

    Choice Media on the AASA reform special ed’s dispute resolution system

    For those who like to hear the issues, here’s audio! Enjoy!

     

    http://choicemedia.tv/2013/06/10/reforms-proposed-for-special-ed-conflicts/

    Post by Miriam Kurtzig Freedman, M.A., J.D. | No Comments

    June 8th, 2013

    Join us!

    I”l be speaking at LegalForce Book Flip this Wednesday, June 12 at 6 PM. The topic will be Special Education Law—An Introduction to the Basics. It should be lively and fun. Here’s the sign up.

    http://legalforce42.eventbrite.com/

     

     

    Post by Miriam Kurtzig Freedman, M.A., J.D. | No Comments

    June 6th, 2013

    EdSource discussion of the AASA report on reforming special ed due process–and SpedEx

    As loyal readers know, the AASA (American Association of School Administrators) recently wrote a report on reforming special education due process.   I believe they did a great public services in doing so–bringing this issue forward.  It’s generated some controversy and discussion.

    It’s been amazing to see the AASA cite our Massachusetts dispute resolution option–based on a jointly selected consultant–SpedEx, as a model going forward!   We in Massachusetts have had success with SpedEx and do believe it could serve as  a model nationwide.

    However, there are differences between the AASA version and SpedEx. The major difference, in my view, is that SpedEx is voluntary for schools and parents and that parties do NOT waive any of their due process rights.  See  EdSource below!

    http://www.edsource.org/today/2013/its-about-time-reforming-due-process-in-special-education/33080#.UbCc1EAWIRc

    Let’s keep this important discussion going. Surely together we can build a better system for schools, parents, and students!

     

    Post by Miriam Kurtzig Freedman, M.A., J.D. | No Comments

    May 29th, 2013

    AASA post by Exec. Dir. Dan Domenech …. on SpedEx

    http://www.aasaconnect.com/index.php?bid=20&BlogCategoryID=0&BlogEntryID=571&FormID=300

    Post by Miriam Kurtzig Freedman, M.A., J.D. | No Comments

    May 15th, 2013

    Education Week: the AASA special ed proposal and our Massachusetts SpedEx!

    Go Massachusetts!  It’s great to see that our innovative reform, SpedEx, has gone national!

    http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2013/05/08/30iep.h32.html

    SpedEx is an alternate dispute resolution model for parents and schools. It provides them with a jointly selected consultant who will assist them in resolving their dispute about the child’s IEP (Individualized Education Program). SpedEx is child focused, trust-building, free-to-the-parties, and so far, a successful innovation! Please read more about it at

    http://spedexresolution.com.

    We are happy to serve as AASA’s national model! Onward and upward to fix special education.

     

    Post by Miriam Kurtzig Freedman, M.A., J.D. | No Comments

    May 5th, 2013

    Special Education lawsuit against California Department of Education proceeds…..

    If you read down to the bottom, you’ll see me quoted about SpedEx andthe fact that no one is happy with the current system.

    This is a lawsuit to watch.

    http://www.mercurynews.com/education/ci_23161202/special-education-california-parents-lawsuit-could-force-expansion

    Post by Miriam Kurtzig Freedman, M.A., J.D. | No Comments

    April 28th, 2013

    SpedEx at CADRE–Here’s the video

    In October 2011, CADRE sponsored it’s 5th National Symposium on Dispute Resolution in Special Education. I was invited to present about SpeEx.  Since SpedEx has become so timely and national (see my last few blogs), I am happy to provide my material and this video. Enjoy!

    http://www.directionservice.org/cadre/freedmanvid.cfm

    In the intervening years, SpedEx has continued to be successful and grow (though it is still a pilot program) in Massachusetts.  For those of us who have been involved with SpedEx, it’s been been gratifying to see the AASA (American Association of School Administrators) and Education Week highlight this consultant process as a dispute resolution model.

     

    Post by Miriam Kurtzig Freedman, M.A., J.D. | No Comments