Inclusion, inclusion…for what purpose?
(Boulder's efforts for inclusion) As I read this article, I am concerned about the purpose of the move to more inclusion. What is that purpose? Let's be very clear! It is to improve learning outcomes for ALL students in the schools--regular and special education, gifted and average, 'at risk' and all others. I echo and strongly support the folks who focus the purpose of inclusion on improving teaching and learning for ALL students. I am very concerned about those who focus on [...]It’s’ my story and I’m sticking with it!
Thinking a bit more about that College Board report (Friday's blog)..... When I came to America in 4th grade, unfortunately, it became time to slide by in my schooling. Yes, I had to learn English. And I did that. But, the substance of our learning so much easier than what I was used to... Consider. In Holland, we had learned the multiplication tables up to 20! In our heads! No calculators. No aids. 18 x 17. 13 x 16. Etc. And it was fun! In the public school in New Jersey, where I [...]Worrisome College Board report…
Now the College Board tells us what we instinctively kinda, sorta knew already--the US lags in college graduation rates--when compared to other countries. We used to be the world leader in education. And, we all know that education is key to our continued growth and success in the coming years. So this is a worrisome report. (US, once leader, now lags in college graduation). What to do? Some say, OK--leave it. We don't need to be # 1 forever. I don't agree. I believe we need to [...]If you build it, will they break it?
(Massachusetts debates joining the national standards). Massachusetts has been touted as having among the best standards in the U.S. So now, the move is on to join the 'national standards.' A hot, hot controversy in the Bay State. Will this move lower the standards? Essentially bring an end to the MCAS test? Raise the standards? Have no effect really? It's hard to know what's right on this issue. I have not read through the proposed standards. My question is whether the state [...]See my letter in today’s Boston Globe…
(Letter about hiring special educators, according to Globe article of July 11) Check it out! Your thoughts? The letter and article generated lots of on-line comment.The Boston Globe published my letter, “Better Ed, not special ed.”
The Boston Globe published my letter that they titled, “Better Ed, not special ed.” It’s about hiring more regular educators to beef up regular education as a way to improve learning for all, rather than just hiring special educators. http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/letters/articles/2010/07/14/better_ed_instead_of_special_ed/John Merrow’s new book cites Miriam and her book
John Merrow's new book, Below C Level--How American Education Encourages Mediocrity and What We Can Do About It cites Miriam and the Fixing Special Education--12 Steps to Transform a Broken System book!If you’re on Cape Cod this Thursday….
I'll be speaking at the MASS conference (Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents) in Mashpee! Topic: Fixing Special Education and its Ethical Dilemmas. Come join us!No jobs for teachers, except in special education.
(Teaching jobs in special education, but not other fields). I read this article with great sadness. The trend is leading education in the wrong direction. The way to improve special education is to improve regular education. We need to add more teachers--especially at the early grades to teach students how to read and do math (and never need special education.) Sadly, however, this is not happening. The trend is not a good sign. We cannot continue to grow the special education [...]More teacher union members than ever! Better schools?
( AFT now has more than a million and a half members). More union members? Better education? You decide.